“I have brought peace, freedom, justice and security to my new empire!” Anakin Skywalker shouts, his voice trembling with rage and conviction. To Obi-Wan Kenobi, standing amidst the lava flows and ash of Mustafar, these words are unrecognizable. They are the rhetoric of freedom spoken by a friend — a brother — who can’t even see that he has become totally enslaved. He had become the very thing he swore to destroy.
It is one of the most haunting scenes in cinema because it feels so familiar. It is not just the fall of a man; it is the fall of an ideal. Anakin’s tragedy is that he truly believed freedom could be found by cutting his ties to the very order that had given his life virtuous structure.
From the beginning, Anakin struggled under the weight of the Jedi Code. Its restrictions felt narrow, its traditions immovable, its authority suffocating. The Code demanded emotional restraint, detachment, and — notably — forbade marriage. Anakin’s love for Padmé Amidala, hidden and unblessed, came to represent everything he mistakenly thought the Jedi could not understand: compassion, commitment, the right to love freely. To him, the Jedi’s refusal to recognize his love seemed baseless and cruel, even unjust. The institution that had raised him had also, in his mind, refused him the fullness of life.
So he began to pursue a new kind of freedom — one not bounded by the old creeds, the old confessions, the old authorities. He wanted to act for good without being told what good actually was, following his heart without constraint. It is not hard to see the appeal.
But in seeking that freedom apart from the Order, Anakin mistook rebellion for righteousness. He wanted to save lives, end wars and right wrongs — but on his own terms. His conscience, untethered from discipline, quickly became indistinguishable from desire. When he felt the Jedi’s wisdom to be too slow or too rigid, he replaced it with his own. And when that wasn’t enough, he turned to another master who promised him power, understanding and liberation from all constraints.
The tragedy is that Anakin did not stop believing in truth; he simply decided to define it himself.
In his quest to see through the lies of the Jedi and their fickle boundaries, Anakin fell under a far darker authority. The freedom he sought outside the Code became slavery to Emperor Palpatine. He traded the structure of an imperfect order for the tyranny of his own will — and eventually, that became the will of Palpatine. The same man who spoke so strongly of freedom would come to enforce a brutal, merciless empire. Anakin Skywalker, in his quest for “unbounded freedom,” had become the very thing he swore to destroy.
This is what happens when freedom is separated from formation — when the longing to do what feels right overtakes the call to live within what is right. The Jedi Code, for all its flaws and failures, was not meant to enslave Anakin but to shape him. It aimed to teach humility, to check the impulse to make oneself sovereign. Its boundaries were meant to protect both the Jedi and the galaxy from the danger of unrestrained conviction. Anakin came to see those boundaries as unjust — and by tearing them down, he created the tragic tale Ben Kenobi told Anakin’s son, Luke: Darth Vader did, in a way, kill Anakin Skywalker.
His story is not mere ancient history from a galaxy far, far away. It is the human story — the story of Eden revisited. The serpent’s whisper is the same: You will be like God. This sounds strikingly like Emperor Palpatine: You will know better. You will save her. You will be truly powerful. You will be freer once you cast off the old words, the old authority, the old creeds and confessions. But every time humanity seizes that promise, the result is the same: we enthrone ourselves, become slaves to sin and call it freedom.
Anakin’s fall, not unlike our own, shows how easily the language of freedom can become a mask for autonomy. His motives were not evil at first. He wanted compassion, life and love to be unbounded by trivial things like law, caution and humility. But without confession and submission to a greater truth, his desires became distorted — masked by black armor and wielded with a terrible red blade.
Freedom without healthy boundaries is not freedom at all; it is anarchy against the good.
And yet the story does not end in Mustafar’s fire. Years later, when Luke Skywalker stands before his father, he calls him back — not to autonomy, but to belonging. He does not offer Vader new power or independence; he offers Anakin reconciliation. Anakin’s redemption is not realized in asserting himself, but in surrendering — in humbly bowing once more to the truth and authority he had once betrayed so utterly.
That is the paradox of true freedom. It comes not through mastery, but through confession. Not in the destruction of authority, but by flourishing within it. The Jedi were imperfect, yes — but Anakin’s answer should not have been to leave and destroy the Order. His freedom would only have been found in serving it faithfully from within, rather than enthroning himself above it.
There are, perhaps, lessons in this story for other communities that wrestle with what it means to be free, and the temptation to define freedom as self-rule will always return. But the Gospel reminds us that freedom, properly understood, is found not in standing apart, but in belonging rightly.
The path to true freedom is not “my new empire.” It is always “my Lord and my God.”
As Abraham Kuyper reminds us, “There is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is sovereign over all, does not cry, ‘Mine!’”
Calvin Kuyers • Nov 25, 2025 at 8:47 am
Thank you for highlighting so well the way in which the CRC is behaving like Anakin – fashioning a new empire upon church law (which brings death).
But I’m sure we’ll hear at the next synod how “peace, freedom, justice, and security have been brought to the CRC!”
A congregation ruling itself by law apart from the Spirit (which brings life) will never last – just like the Sith AND the Jedi.
I can already see Luke looking over his shoulder as we’re so clearly headed for the same sequel: “..it is time… for the CRC… to end.”
We have enthroned our own ways of church order and traded imperfect structure for tyranny – just like Anakin.
We are ALL called to bow before the Truth – is that the CRC? Or is it the person of Jesus Christ?
Is the Kingdom of God the Institution of the Church? Or is it an eternal, living man?
If confession is our goal, why is church leadership SO much more concerned with confession of personal belief (pride), rather than the confession of personal sin (humility)? (Luke 18:9-14)