Opinion: Calvin weak in the face of white supremacy
On Aug. 11–12, tiki-torch wielding white supremacists, outfitted in khaki pants and white polo shirts, carrying shields and saluting Sieg Heil, descended upon Charlottesville, Virginia. They swarmed a church, overwhelmed the University of Virginia campus, rushed a group of nonviolent clergy and murdered Heather Heyer.
Five days later, on Thursday, Aug. 17, Calvin students received an email sent on behalf of college president Michael Le Roy titled “Together We Serve a Vital Mission.” Inside was a 250-word message welcoming students back to campus, reminding them of the college’s mission to “to think deeply, to act justly and to live wholeheartedly,” and a reinforcement of Calvin’s model of academic community: one “that meets arrogance with humility, hatred with love, bluster with wisdom, falsehood with truth, injustice with justice, ignorance with learning.”
The letter also included a brief statement regarding the white supremacist terrorist actions in Charlottesville:
“One of the core values that is linked to our mission is the belief that every person on this earth is fearfully and wonderfully made and is an image bearer of God. Given this shared belief, our community can only understand the ideology of white supremacy as an evil distortion of God’s vision for human community and we oppose it in all its manifestations.”
That it took five days for this short statement to be released is perplexing. Five days is a long time. Long enough for several students — myself included — to become uncomfortable with the silence from Calvin’s administration. During those five days, we came forth with our concern, repeatedly urging the administration to release a statement. The delay — and the apparent silence — became even more significant when other similar organizations, including the Christian Reformed Church in North America and Calvin Theological Seminary, publicly released strong statements before the Calvin administration had written one.
When we consider Calvin’s institutional commitments regarding racial justice, the slow response and weak nature of the final statement become even more troubling. Pages 28–29 of “From Every Nation,” the document that guides Calvin’s approach to matters of race, ethnicity, diversity and inclusion, reads, “an effective strategy to promote racial justice requires addressing … structures and practices that implant notions of superiority in the hearts and minds of white people.”
Calvin is not unaware of its historic failures to meet this model. In section IV, “Diversity & Inclusion,” of “Strategic Plan: Calvin 2019,” the administration affirms that “the College has not always succeeded in its efforts [as detailed in ‘From Every Nation’], but it remains committed to examining the ‘deeper structures’ of the College, holding itself accountable to ‘communities of color.’”
The strategic plan was written about a year before an incident in November 2015 in which unidentified students drew a swastika and wrote “White Power” in snow on a windshield in a campus parking lot. A number of prayer and campus unity events followed the incident, but students never learned who the perpetrators were or if they remained on campus.
With this context in mind — the institutional commitments of the college and the particular white supremacist violence that is still a cause of fear and concern for many students — the official statement from Calvin College in response to the violence of Charlottesville rings hollow.
The statement, released four days too late, dedicates less than a paragraph to the matter at hand: unilaterally and unflinching denouncing white supremacy, white nationalism and all its manifestations.
I imagine the Calvin administration expects a pat on the back for saying white supremacy is evil. I know many Calvin constituents saw this statement as just soft enough and just firm enough to maintain the status quo, to allow everyone to resume their lives with an illusion of reconciliation.
Yet to constituents of color, the statement offers no protection, no guidance, no comfort that Calvin College is or will be a place of refuge, a place that fights for them. And to white supremacist constituents, the message is clear: Calvin College will wag a finger at you, then carry on as if nothing happened.
That is why this statement is so sinister. In its delay, in its dancing around the matter at hand, in its cushioning a soft rebuke with brand-centric language, the Calvin administration did nothing but posture itself as the white moderate, ultimately unconcerned with the fates and feelings of those not privy to its privileges. The administration shows absolutely no courage in facing off against white supremacy. Like the rest of the white moderate, who prioritize nothing but their own comfort and security, the Calvin administration outs itself as a pillar upholding white supremacy.
Calvin College claims a commitment to diversity, inclusion and racial reconciliation, but when called upon to stand against something so clearly denounced in policies and plans, it utterly fails. This statement is all but a de facto rejection of the principles called for in Calvin’s Strategic Plan and “From Every Nation.”
If the administration cannot produce a stronger statement — one that takes the mandates of those documents seriously—it should be honest about what Calvin College is and dispose of the Diversity & Inclusion section of the strategic plan, as well as the Anti-Racism, Reconciliation and Restoration sections of “From Every Nation.”
It should never be difficult to denounce white supremacy. Unless you are dedicated to upholding it.
Marty Wondaal • Oct 1, 2017 at 12:19 pm
It is no surprise that this issue has come back. This is what happens when you fan the flames of grievance politics.
Will any faculty members stand up and defend the college?
Marty Wondaal • Sep 30, 2017 at 8:01 pm
So the Snowflake Infraction™ has resurfaced…
It was only a matter of time before it came back; that’s what happens when you fan the flames of grievance politics.
Whomever was the perpetrator (by the way, again, was he or she a white person?) must surely know how Steve Bartman feels. But this (these?) poor soul is not the only culprit. It is time to really end this, once and for all.
Here is my solution: if you really want to attack White Supremecy at Calvin, then you must cut the head off of the serpent: immediately terminate every white male faculty member, particularly those with Dutch surnames. Enough is enough.
Jacob Bruinius • Sep 25, 2017 at 1:07 pm
“The strategic plan was written about a year before an incident in November 2015 in which unidentified students drew a swastika and wrote “White Power” in snow on a windshield in a campus parking lot. A number of prayer and campus unity events followed the incident, but students never learned who the perpetrators were or if they remained on campus.”
I’m confused by this. As a student who was on campus when this event took place, I thought that the Calvin administration went above and beyond in their handling of this incident. I never got the impression that it was simply “swept under the rug,” as another commentator put it: students kept getting constant updates about the incident throughout the school year, it was all over the news, and it sparked discussions about racial issues all over campus. The perpetrators of the incident were recommended by Campus Safety to the Kent County police for prosecution (although, admittedly, no action was taken on their part). Are you implying that Calvin should have violated federal law by publicly outing the perpetrators of the incident, ensuring that they will be harassed on social media by outraged students and parents, perpetuating a cycle of hate and misunderstanding?
Eric Nykamp • Sep 24, 2017 at 8:08 pm
Gweneth, thank you for this succinct, heartfelt piece. Yes, our college has difficulty responding quickly to events, which leaves the impression that there is a fear of upsetting powerful constituencies, a fear that seems more powerful than speaking up against evil. There are some things which are more important to speak up about than to keep a false peace.
Kaitlin • Sep 24, 2017 at 1:23 pm
To even suggest that Calvin is dedicated to upholding white supremacy is absolutely ridiculous.
Joseph Kuilema • Sep 25, 2017 at 3:51 pm
Kaitlin,
I thought I’d share this piece I wrote in the Chimes after the incident some of the other folks here mentioned in 2015. I do not think it’s ridiculous at all to say that Calvin upholds white supremacy through some of its actions and policies.
https://calvinchimes.org/13321/opinion-editorial/racism-white-supremacy-and-white-privilege/
Jeff • Sep 28, 2017 at 12:12 am
Joseph,
You are so far up your own behind if you seriously think that Calvin upholds white supremacy. Your reply, your article and this article rest on many implications that don’t hold up logically.
1. Every white person is assumed to be racist unless they outwardly acknowledge that they have it easier than everyone else.
2. Calvin College is assumed to be racist until they signal that they are not.
3. Any delay by Calvin in asserting that they are not racist actually signals that they are racist.
This is not to even mention the fact that you seem to think Calvin is responsible to weigh in on events not remotely related to Calvin. Where does this line get drawn? Do you need President LeRoy to reassure you that Calvin College does not support North Korea’s nuclear program? Do Calvin’s professors need to remind you that Calvin does not condone genocide when teaching about the Holocaust?
While it is also very brave of you to confess all the things you are guilty of by virtue of being white, it would be worth considering that race is not the cause of the distribution in every aspect of society. Racism exists, racists exist, and minorities have many problems that white people may never have to deal with. However, a closer look may reveal to you that race is also closely correlated with familial situation and socioeconomic class. These are the greatest predictors for the lot someone will have in life. Do you think Will Smith’s kids will have a harder life than the kids of a divorced white coal miner in West Virginia?
You might contend that white people in the institutions are forcing the minorities to remain in broken family situations and in poverty. If you can show me a concrete case of a certain institution or law that is inherently racist, I will gladly join you in fighting to right that injustice. However, by espousing that minorities are facing this shadowy, faceless monster of “institutional racism”, all you are accomplishing is patting yourself on the back and avoiding the real issues that the economically disadvantaged face.
The same is true of Calvin. Instead of being so vague in your accusations, show me a Calvin College policy that targets minorities or perpetuates white supremacy. Introduce me to a faculty member at Calvin who is promoting white supremacy. I will gladly support you in the face of real injustice that you can identify, but I can do nothing to fight the vague notion of “Calvin upholding white supremacy” (except for writing Chimes articles I guess).
Until then, I hope you have enough common sense to know that white supremacy is wrong without President LeRoy reminding you.
Mark • Sep 25, 2017 at 8:31 pm
I completely agree. The thesis of this piece is essentially “Calvin took 5 long days to make an official statement about white supremacy incidents that happened elsewhere, and had already denounced hate speech and white supremacy in the past. They are obviously supporting white supremacy.” This kind of yellow journalistic article is not helpful in healing or even fostering reasonable discussion. To insinuate the leadership of Calvin supports white supremacy in any way really is detestable.
Helen Groothuis • Sep 24, 2017 at 9:21 am
I too remember this incident from a couple of years ago, and am disappointed at Calvin’s response to that and to the events in Charlottesville. I agree with everything that you’ve said Gwyneth; I think Calvin should be held more accountable for its actions regarding these matters, and I’m furious that it thinks they can get away with a short statement of condemnation before moving on. This is a very well-written article, I might add; I hope to see more of your work in the future.
-Helen, Class of ’17
Randy Buist • Sep 24, 2017 at 12:52 am
A well written piece Gwyneth Findlay. When I attended Calvin, II was often impressed by the students who wrote this kind of piece in the Chimes, and inevitably facing the adversity that it i brings Thank you for your voice, sharing your gifted writing skills, and your passion for justice as we seek the kingdom and the ways of Jesus.
Randy Buist
’91
Kelly jenkins • Sep 23, 2017 at 4:42 pm
as a parent of a Calvin student of color, I still want to know what the outcome of the incident that happened on campus. Are these people still allowed on campus? Are they still Calvin students? I feel that was swept under the rug! Maybe not taken seriously? As a parent I took it VERY SERIOUS!
Kaitlin • Sep 24, 2017 at 1:16 pm
The incident that happened on Calvin’s campus was taken very seriously. The family educational rights and privacy act (FERPA) prevents the school from being able to disclose information.
Calvin Student • Sep 24, 2017 at 2:52 pm
The student wasn’t allowed to finish school for that year, but they are back this year.
jon gorter • Sep 22, 2017 at 8:17 pm
Such an excellent piece of writing, of argumentation, of thoughts expressed clearly and effectively, of opinion journalism. Painful that LeRoy’s statement addresses nothing of the “structures and practices that implant notions of superiority in the hearts and minds of white people,” but merely states that white supremacy is wrong and “wags a finger,” as you write. CALVIN PLEASE READ THIS ARTICLE.
Ivana Blohmahlode • Sep 22, 2017 at 12:10 pm
Lol