The Downsize Pt. I: ‘If you can leave, please consider doing so’
October 6, 2021
As faculty morale decreases in the wake of two years of layoffs and increased budget cuts, Calvin is giving experienced professors a way out.
In its latest move to cut academic program costs, the university is offering to pay professors with 15 or more years of experience to voluntarily resign next fall.
Provost Noah Toly announced the Voluntary Exit Incentive Program on Monday, Oct. 4. Under the new program, regular faculty members who have worked at Calvin for longer than 15 years are eligible for up to 75 percent of their annual salary in severance if they choose to resign, according to a human resources information packet given to Chimes by faculty members.
The program is part of a larger plan designed to address current and predicted decreases in revenue and enrollment in the next five years. Toly’s letter introducing the program also says it will serve to “minimize the prospects for involuntary separations.”
“This sends a pretty negative message to faculty members about our jobs and the state of the university, and it raises all kinds of questions about what’s coming next,” biology professor David Koetje told Chimes.
Koetje, who’s worked at Calvin for 23 years, said it would be too difficult on his family if he were to resign. His high school-age son hopes to attend Calvin someday, and if Koetje were to leave, his son would lose the opportunity for a tuition waiver. Still, the idea of the decision weighs on him.
“It’s an awful place to be. You’re trying to balance between the needs of your family and the institution,” Koetje said.
The type of faculty targeted by the VEIP are experienced and thus expensive to the university. Professors with long histories at Calvin typically have higher salaries reflecting their deeper academic knowledge and teaching skill. Other institutions are less likely to invest in hiring these older professors, according to Koetje.
Though the VEIP is completely voluntary, it’s not without its pressures.
“There will be people who are going to leave simply because they’re concerned that others might be let go if they don’t,” said Gary Schmidt, an English professor eligible for the program. “… It’s a really awkward place to put a faculty member in, because it makes it seem as though the faculty member is responsible for someone else’s job or is making a decision that means someone else goes.”
Approximately 120 of Calvin’s 183 regular faculty members are eligible for the program, according to Andy George, director of human resources. It’s too soon to tell how many are seriously considering the option.
According to the provost, the plan wasn’t designed with a specific numeric goal in mind.
“The goal of the voluntary exit incentive is not to generate a specific number of faculty departures or a specific reduction in expenses. Rather, the goals include achieving a greater percentage of our budget adjustments through voluntary departures, generating the budgetary space we would need to make other changes less abrupt, and gaining traction and valuable information early in our planning cycle,” Toly told Chimes.
“It does send the message that if we don’t get people taking advantage of this, then yeah, there will be some further layoffs,” said Koetje. “They’re saying, ‘If you can leave, please consider doing so.’”
Of the 13 professors Chimes spoke to, none were seriously considering the program at this time. Many said they had briefly looked over the information packet, dismissed the idea as unfeasible or undesirable and moved on.
Faculty members who do elect to participate will be expected to separate from the university on Aug. 31, 2022. However, if more than 40 percent of a department’s eligible faculty decide to leave the university under the VEIP, their exits will be staggered over multiple years, giving preference based on seniority.
Severance packages will be equivalent to two weeks’ pay for every year of service or 75 percent of a faculty member’s total salary, whichever is lower. These benefits will be paid out semi-monthly until Aug. 31, 2023.
Insurance coverage will also be available through Aug. 31, 2023, and faculty children at Calvin will be able to finish their education under existing tuition waivers.
A deadline of Oct. 29 gives eligible faculty just under a month to decide about their future at Calvin.
“It emphasizes the sense of crisis that Calvin is in,” said history professor Frans van Liere. He added, “There has been a great sense of loyalty of faculty to the college, and my fear is that that will be eroded with the rather short-term and haphazard nature of offers like this.”
Toly admits the program is a sudden announcement.
“I recognize that this program may come as a surprise to many, even if the realities it addresses are well enough known,” the provost wrote in his letter announcing the VEIP.
Those well-known realities include the COVID-related budget shortfalls and decreasing enrollment that have led to two rounds of program cuts and layoffs in the past two years.
In June 2020, Calvin eliminated two major programs, three minors, and 18 employees, including 12 faculty members.
The process was repeated in 2021, when the Board of Trustees moved to eliminate two tenured faculty members, five major programs and seven minors.
Twelve other faculty retired or resigned in 2021, and their positions were not refilled. The university also outsourced its facilities labor.
Departments have replaced many retiring full-time faculty members with contingent faculty in years past. A number of other positions simply haven’t been refilled. Contingent faculty are often cheaper for the university, vary in levels of experience and education, and do not take on the added responsibilities of committee membership or performing research.
“I’m incredibly grateful for the contributions of all our faculty — their transformative teaching, their wonderful scholarship, and their tireless and joyful service,” said Toly. “It is always sad when we have departures — even voluntary ones — but we trust that God will provide for Calvin and for our colleagues even in the midst of this change.”
As this series continues, Chimes will explore the impacts of increases in contingent faculty, the roles regular faculty play in decision making, the reasoning behind the cuts and layoffs of the past year, and the administration’s plans for the future.
James VK • Oct 20, 2023 at 9:00 am
As an alumni of this once great institution, I can firmly say that given the direction the college took under President LeRoy, I would not suggest anyone with a conservative Christian mindset to attend my alma mater. Calvin’s position as a bastion of Christian thought fell victim to progressive agenda. When colleges and universities start prioritizing DEI and political agendas above the foundations of the college, i.e. faith based curriculum, they will tumble. Whether administrators would like to believe it or not, Calvin’s strength was in its legacy enrollment. I am a third generation Knight. Many of my friends and classmates were third generation Knights as well. I can say unequivocally that each of them have the same takeaway; Calvin gave up its roots and foundational principles to appease a vocal progressive minority. Unfortunately, this will be the end of Calvin. whether it be in 10 years, or 20, there are too many high level institutions that either bring more name recognition for the same cost, or just cost less in an age where knowledge can be garnered online at an equal level and for less debt. The spiral will continue, the quality of faculty will continue to decrease and the cost will continue to rise. Much like the political world we abide in now, Calvin, your circumstances are a result of the leadership you chose.
Pamela Riney-Kehrberg • Oct 8, 2021 at 9:00 am
“There will be people who are going to leave simply because they’re concerned that others might be let go if they don’t,” said Gary Schmidt, an English professor eligible for the program. “… It’s a really awkward place to put a faculty member in, because it makes it seem as though the faculty member is responsible for someone else’s job or is making a decision that means someone else goes.”
My god, this is horrible.
I cannot imagine putting people in this position.
Greg Sipka • Oct 7, 2021 at 7:56 pm
Good thing they can keep running a program in the prisons apparently they feel it’s better to put resources there instead of loyal staff and tuition paying students. Nothing against prison programs but should take care of the other things first like the ones who actually support the university In my opinion
Todd Cioffi • Oct 16, 2021 at 9:42 am
Greg, I appreciate your concern. At first glance, it may seem that resources for the Calvin Prison Initiative could be better used for the main campus, given the financial needs of the University. However, as the director of the Calvin Prison Initiative, I want to assure you that no funds from the University are used to support the Calvin Prison Initiative. In fact, the prison program is fully funded by outside donations. Calvin Theological Seminary, as a partner of the program, raises the funds needed for the prison program, and the folks at Calvin Seminary do a fantastic job. With that said, I am thankful that the prison program can continue even in the midst of tough times at Calvin University. Again, thanks for your concern, Greg. All the best, Todd Cioffi.
Sara Bennett • Oct 7, 2021 at 4:55 pm
I agree with David. Tuition costs at Calvin are only palatable due to the expertise and experience of tenured Professors. Removing that value will only lead to further plummeting enrollment rates.
Dan Ryan • Oct 7, 2021 at 3:43 pm
It would be easier to not be cynical about this if the rhetoric were equally directed at upper admin. One guesses we’d hear a chorus of “oh no, they and their experience are needed.” The very folks who are not succeeding at recruitment and fundraising always seem to be able to shift the repercussions onto shoulders of others.
Brian Burchett • Oct 7, 2021 at 2:48 pm
In a chess match sacrificing your queen can be a way to postpone defeat, but it’s extremely rare to sacrifice your queen and actually end up winning the match.
I’m sorry to say that while this approach may delay the inevitable, but it doesn’t seem like an approach that will keep Calvin in existence for another 20 or 50 or 75 years.
David L Medema • Oct 7, 2021 at 9:42 am
This looks like a circular firing squad. Dump your brightest and best, rely on less experience and competence, and hire adjuncts. You will get what you pay for and fewer students will come as Calvin’s reputation will erode as a premiere academic center of brilliance. Tragic.